We can classify relations based on various properties. These help us understand how the relation behaves and what type of mathematical structure it belongs to.
A relation is reflexive if every element is related to itself.
In other words: every element is connected to itself, so for example (1,1), (2,2), (3,3) are always in the relation.
Example: The "≤" relation is reflexive because every number is less than or equal to itself.
Counterexample: The "<" relation is not reflexive because no number is less than itself.
A relation is symmetric if whenever a is related to b, b is related to a.
In other words: connections are bidirectional; if (a,b) is in the relation, so is (b,a).
Example: The "sibling of" relation is symmetric: if Anna is sibling of Béla, then Béla is sibling of Anna.
Counterexample: The "parent of" relation is not symmetric: if Anna is parent of Béla, Béla is not parent of Anna.
A relation is antisymmetric if whenever a is related to b and b to a, then a = b.
In other words: bidirectional connections can only occur between identical elements.
Example: The "≤" relation is antisymmetric: if a ≤ b and b ≤ a, then a = b.
Counterexample: The "friend of" relation is not antisymmetric: if A is friend of B and B of A, they are still different people.
A relation is asymmetric if whenever a is related to b, b is not related to a.
In other words: no bidirectional connections at all, even between identical elements (strict asymmetry excludes self-loops).
Example: The "<" relation is asymmetric: if a < b, then b < a is false.
Counterexample: The "≤" relation is not asymmetric because if a = b, then (a,b) and (b,a) both hold.
A relation is transitive if whenever a is related to b and b to c, then a is related to c.
In other words: connections 'chain': if there's a path of length 2, there's a direct connection.
Example: The "≤" relation is transitive: if a ≤ b and b ≤ c, then a ≤ c.
Counterexample: The "parent of" relation is not always transitive (grandparent cases vary).
A relation is total if every pair of elements is comparable: for any a, b, either (a,b) or (b,a) is in the relation.
In other words: between any two elements, one is related to the other.
Example: The "≤" relation on integers is total because for any two numbers, one is less than or equal to the other.
Counterexample: The divisibility relation is not total because for example 2 and 3, neither divides the other.
We have reviewed and checked the materials, but errors may still occur. The content is provided for educational purposes only, so use it at your own responsibility and verify with other sources if needed.
Please sign in to ask Lara about Properties of Relations.
Select Language
Set theme
© 2025 ReadyTools. All rights reserved.